Open Communication.
Personal Attention.
BIG Results.
Open Communication.
Personal Attention.
BIG Results.
The Experienced Personal Injury Attorneys at Ferrante & Koenig Are On Your Side
Ferrante & Koenig are New York injury attorneys who have devoted their careers to fighting for justice for people like you. They’ve helped hundreds of people pick up the pieces after an accident and move forward with their lives.
Given that you’re researching personal injury attorneys, we assume that you or a loved one has been injured. A consultation with us to discuss the details of your case is absolutely free of charge.
We invite you to give us a call if you’ve been injured. You will get an honest opinion and a clear assessment of your potential injury case. Every matter is taken on a contingency fee basis, which means that if we can help you there will be no fee unless we obtain a verdict or settlement in your case.
Our New York City Personal Injury Lawyers litigate cases arising from the following types of incidents and accidents:
CAR ACCIDENTS
CAR ACCIDENTS
SIDEWALK ACCIDENTS
SIDEWALK ACCIDENTS
WORK-RELATED ACCIDENTS
WORK-RELATED ACCIDENTS
SLIP & FALL ACCIDENTS
SLIP & FALL ACCIDENTS
Featured Case Results
$2,325,000
For client who was left alone by her attendant and caused to suffer a fall and leg injury resulting in a partial amputation. The defense tried to blame the plaintiff claiming that she was acting on her own. Thorough discovery revealed that the attendant departed from good and accepted practice by leaving the plaintiff despite clear indications that the plaintiff was not to be left alone. Non-party witness testimony obtained from a former executive who was in charge at the time of the accident confirmed that the home care protocols were clearly violated by the home attendant, which was a direct cause of the accident.
$2,100,000
For client who suffered injuries to neck, shoulder and knee requiring surgeries after tripping and falling on debris left on the floor by store employee. At trial, the defense attempted to claim that the unwitnessed accident would have been picked up by video, and the fact that video does not depict the accident calls into question whether or not the accident ever happened. Upon further questioning, however, the defense witness admitted that the video camera globes in the area of the accident were nothing more than dummy camera heads which were installed solely as a visual deterrent to would-be shoplifters. There was no video of the accident since the cameras in the area of the accident were inoperable.
$1,900,000
For client who was injured during construction when he was struck by falling debris. During a demolition project, the plaintiff was tasked with removing a large window from an exterior wall. The top of the window stood approximately 10 feet off of the ground. The plaintiff was not provided with an elevated working platform and instructed to stretch a pry bar over his head in an attempt to pry the window out of the wall. As he stretched to pry overhead, the top of the window casement became dislodged and fell from a height of 10 feet, striking the plaintiff and propelling him to the ground.
$1,500,000
For client who slipped and fell on a poorly shoveled sidewalk resulting in leg injuries requiring surgery. The plaintiff walked along a sidewalk in front of a commercial building that had been mostly abandoned by the owner except for a small group of workers who maintained an office for the purposes of winding down the business. The defendant’s witness testified that it had no knowledge of the condition of the sidewalk on the date of the accident, or the days leading up to the accident, and was unable to refute the plaintiff’s testimony that the sidewalk contained a dangerous ice condition. Expert meteorological evidence revealed a classic freeze-thaw-freeze weather pattern which caused the hazardous condition which led to the accident.
Featured Case Results
$2,325,000
For client who was left alone by her attendant and caused to suffer a fall and leg injury resulting in a partial amputation. The defense tried to blame the plaintiff claiming that she was acting on her own. Thorough discovery revealed that the attendant departed from good and accepted practice by leaving the plaintiff despite clear indications that the plaintiff was not to be left alone. Non-party witness testimony obtained from a former executive who was in charge at the time of the accident confirmed that the home care protocols were clearly violated by the home attendant, which was a direct cause of the accident.
$2,100,000
For client who suffered injuries to neck, shoulder and knee requiring surgeries after tripping and falling on debris left on the floor by store employee. At trial, the defense attempted to claim that the unwitnessed accident would have been picked up by video, and the fact that video does not depict the accident calls into question whether or not the accident ever happened. Upon further questioning, however, the defense witness admitted that the video camera globes in the area of the accident were nothing more than dummy camera heads which were installed solely as a visual deterrent to would-be shoplifters. There was no video of the accident since the cameras in the area of the accident were inoperable.
$1,900,000
For client who was injured during construction when he was struck by falling debris. During a demolition project, the plaintiff was tasked with removing a large window from an exterior wall. The top of the window stood approximately 10 feet off of the ground. The plaintiff was not provided with an elevated working platform and instructed to stretch a pry bar over his head in an attempt to pry the window out of the wall. As he stretched to pry overhead, the top of the window casement became dislodged and fell from a height of 10 feet, striking the plaintiff and propelling him to the ground.
$1,500,000
For client who slipped and fell on a poorly shoveled sidewalk resulting in leg injuries requiring surgery. The plaintiff walked along a sidewalk in front of a commercial building that had been mostly abandoned by the owner except for a small group of workers who maintained an office for the purposes of winding down the business. The defendant’s witness testified that it had no knowledge of the condition of the sidewalk on the date of the accident, or the days leading up to the accident, and was unable to refute the plaintiff’s testimony that the sidewalk contained a dangerous ice condition. Expert meteorological evidence revealed a classic freeze-thaw-freeze weather pattern which caused the hazardous condition which led to the accident.
Work With the Experienced Personal Injury Attorneys at Ferrante & Koenig
Work With the Experienced Personal Injury Attorneys at Ferrante & Koenig
To schedule free legal consultation with an attorney skilled in litigating accident cases, please fill out our consultation form, one of our lawyers will reach out to you shortly.
Our attorneys are highly-qualified in the field of personal injury law and offer compassionate and expert legal representation for those harmed by another party’s negligence in construction accidents, car accidents, premises liability, work injuries, and other personal injury matters.
There is no cost to speak to us about your case. We’re here to help. Call us today at (718) 808-8800.
Se habla español